Recently Shanghai Intellectual Property Right Court received the indictment material requesting the confirmation of non-infringement of patent. The Plaintiff, Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Apple Electronic Products Commerce (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Apple Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. claimed that they received a lawyer's letter from the Defendant, Shenzhen Baili Marketing Service Co., Ltd., stating that the iPhone 6 smart phone had infringed its design patent of mobile phone CN201430009113.9. In a demand letter sent from the Plaintiff to the Defendant on April 27, 2015, the Plaintiff requested that the Defendant confirm the involved product does not infringe the claimed patent in written form or the Defendant should lodge a suit on patent infringement to the court.  Within two months after the demand letter was sent out, since the Defendant gave no response or took any action of rights protection, the Plaintiff lodged a suit to Shanghai Intellectual Property Right Court pursuant to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Dispute Cases, requesting the court confirm that the iPhone 6 and iPhong 6 Plus mobile phones sold by the Plaintiff or promised by the Plaintiff to sell do not infringe the design patent of the Defendant. On the other hand, the Plaintiff also requested that the Defendant should compensate RMB 200,000 (tentative estimation) for the Plaintiff's economic loss, cost of right protection and others. This is the first case accepted by Shanghai Intellectual Property Right Court for confirming non-infringement of patent. As for the jurisdiction of the case, the case filing chamber held after the review of indictment material that the confirmation of non-infringement of patent was the extension of infringement lawsuit, and the regulations in relation with such lawsuit were still applicable in terms of territorial jurisdiction. In accordance with Article 28 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, the case should be governed by the people's court where the infringement happened or the domicile of the Defendant locates. As the Plaintiff is the seller who was warned of infringement and the product alleged of infringement is sold in Shanghai, Shanghai is deemed the place where the infringement happened and Shanghai Intellectual Property Right Court shall have jurisdiction over the case.